What We Call Balance, God Calls Mixture

Friday, 11th September 2009

Last week, Ps Reuben was not preaching so my wife and I went to NewCre.

Back in my own home church, a ROOTSS subscriber informed me that Rev Peter Koh mentioned during his sermon that there should be a balance between law and grace. I would have agreed with his position even as recent as 5 years ago. But I now realise that what we call balance, God calls mixture.

That would actually be putting it very mildly. There are stronger words used to describe this.

In Romans 7, Paul describes such a mixture as spiritual adultery.

In Galatians 4, Paul quotes from Genesis where Sarah told Abraham to "cast out the bondwoman and her son".

In Revelations 3, Jesus considers such a condition as lukewarmness and He would vomit such out.

Anyway, it is my turn to lead the Word at my cell meeting tonight, and I asked my cell leader permission to change the discussion questions. I then sent out the following email:

Dear brothers and sisters in Christ

I understand that Rev Peter Koh mentioned during his sermon that we should find a balance between His law and His grace.

This is a topic that is very close to my heart, so if you folks do not mind, please allow us to discuss the following questions instead:

1. Can we balance law and grace?
2. The Law is good, but is it good for man?
3. Did God mean for the Law to be one composite whole, or can we divide it into moral, civil and ceremonial components?

I have included below relevant passages in scripture to facilitate this very interesting discussion.


Question 1: Can We “Balance” Law & Grace?

Consider the following 3 passages:

Romans 7
An Illustration From Marriage
1Do you not know, brothers—for I am speaking to men who know the law—that the law has authority over a man only as long as he lives?

2For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage.
3So then, if she marries another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress, even though she marries another man.
4So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God. 5For when we were controlled by the sinful nature,[a] the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death.

6But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.

Galatians 4
Hagar and Sarah
21Tell me, you who want to be under the law, are you not aware of what the law says?

22For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and the other by the free woman.
23His son by the slave woman was born in the ordinary way; but his son by the free woman was born as the result of a promise.
24These things may be taken figuratively, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children who are to be slaves: This is Hagar.

25Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children.
26But the Jerusalem that is above is free, and she is our mother.
27For it is written:
"Be glad, O barren woman,
who bears no children;
break forth and cry aloud,
you who have no labor pains;
because more are the children of the desolate woman
than of her who has a husband."[b]
28Now you, brothers, like Isaac, are children of promise.

29At that time the son born in the ordinary way persecuted the son born by the power of the Spirit. It is the same now.
30But what does the Scripture say? "Get rid of the slave woman and her son, for the slave woman's son will never share in the inheritance with the free woman's son."[c]
31Therefore, brothers, we are not children of the slave woman, but of the free woman.

Revelations 3
To the Church in Laodicea
14"To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:
These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God's creation.

15I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other!
16So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.

Question 2: The Law is good, but is it good for man?

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil was part of the vegetation that God created on the 3rd day and He saw that it was good, viz

Genesis 1
11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds." And it was so.

12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.

But was this tree good…….. for man?

Genesis 2
16 And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."

By the same token, God’s laws are good and perfect.

Psalm 19
7 The law of the LORD is perfect,
reviving the soul.
The statutes of the LORD are trustworthy,
making wise the simple.


But are they good…… for man?

Romans 7
Struggling With Sin
7What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "Do not covet."[b]

8But sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in me every kind of covetous desire. For apart from law, sin is dead.
9Once I was alive apart from law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died.
10I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death.

Paul also calls it “the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones” (2 Cor 3:7)
and also says that “the strength of sin is the law” (1 Cor 15:56)

Question 3: Did God mean for the Law to be one composite whole, or can we divide it into moral, civil and ceremonial components?

10For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. (Js 2:10)

7For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another (Heb 8:7)
13By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear. (Heb 8:13)


Will let you know how our discussion went. Meanwhile, do keep my cell in prayer :-)

7 comments:

Karine said...

Hi malcolm,

I've been blessed so much by the gospel of Grace preached by ps Prince and other pastors as well. It's good to know that God expects us to be free from condemnation, worry-free, have a healthy and wealthy life. But i never heard them preaching about the "suffering verses" in NT e.g Jesus told us to "take up his cross" (Luke 9:23), Peter ask to suffer just as Jesus did (1 Peter 4:1-2) and in Colossians 1:24.

What are those verses really mean?

Have you any thoughts to share?

catcha said...

Hi Malcolm,
Are you leading a cell back in your methodist church? Yes, I can relate to having to deal with the differences between the typical methodist teachings vs the radical grace teachings. I myself am attending a methodist church back here in Msia as I couldn't find another suitable church to settle in. Sometimes, it's difficult to be comfortable in this church as many times the pastors emphasised on the law more than grace. RLC is very close but it's still different from NCC. Pondering about leaving but I guess the best option is still to come down south to Spore to attend NCC =)

Malcolm Loh said...

Hi catcha

I'm an ordinary cell member, but we take turns to lead worship, bible study, etc.

Malcolm Loh said...

Hi Karine

How I would interpret suffering would be in terms of persecution from those who hold on to legalism.

We read of how Ishmael, the offspring of Hagah (who represents the Law) persecuted Isaac, the offspring of Sarah (who represents grace).

That is still happening today. Many people are criticising Ps Prince and other grace preachers for preaching cheap grace. That is the cross that we grace believers have to bear, but we can consider it pure joy because being persecuted for Christ and His righteousness' sake is a great privilege :-)

Karine said...

Hi Malcolm, thankyou for your answer.

My church is great in teaching Grace, compare to other churches but sometimes i felt the pastors still teach a mixture between law and grace.

What do you think about fasting Malcolm?

My church encourage us to pray and fast. But after hearing the gospel of grace more, i struggled hard within my heart to do that, knowing that by fasting i focused mostly on my self effort and not on Grace.

Malcolm Loh said...

Hi Karine

I used to think that fasting, in addition to prayer, is our way of telling God that we are serious about our prayer requests.

After all, proponents of this "doctrine" would quote a passage where Jesus said to His disciples who could not cast out the demon from a young boy that such could only be done via prayer and fasting (Matt 17:21).

But that verse was only added later on. The original manuscript did not have it.

As to the real reason why they could not, that will be the topic for my blog entry today, so stay tuned :-)

Coming back to the topic of fasting. By doing so, it is as though we are trying to earn God's favour, which goes against what grace is all about - His unearned, undeserved, unmerited favour.

If you do not feel at peace in going on a fast, then don't. The Holy Spirit will not lead you into a situation where His shalom peace is absent.

Thomas Liau said...

Hi Malcolm,

Last weekend the Boys' Brigade of Singapore has its yearly event called "Character Quest". The outdoor segment is called "Game of Life" which the boys take on the role of "Ah Beng", a 16 year school dropout who did not complete his primary school. The boys will have to go through "life" making decisions to gain points for various areas. The various areas are health, knowledge, relationships and wealth. Each activity they do and decision they make will determine if they lose or gain points in the various areas. The objective of this activity was to teach boys to have a balance lifestyle of health, knowledge, relationships and wealth. This reminds me of what you blog here about balancing law and grace. In our own natural human tendencies, we believe that striking a balance in everything is a good thing, but I have come to understand that this is not how God works. As in the game, some activity the boys do will help them gain points in wealth but lose points in health, this is typical for one who has not understood the grace of God. I believe God wants us bless us in health, wealth, knowledge and relationships and not try to balance them. As I reflect, it is sad that these are the values being taught to our boys in an organization like the Boys Brigade instead of teaching them about seeking God's Righteousness "and all these things will be added to them". Please share your view on this.