Strengthening Ourselves in the Lord

Sunday, 27th September 2009

The overall theme that The Next Generation ("TNG") (which is what youth service of my church is called) has embarked on is based on Eph 2:10 whereby Paul tells us that each of us are masterpieces, God's workmanship or handiwork.

When we look at ourselves as we currently physically are, this may not be the case, but it does not change the spiritual reality of what God's Word declares.

Earlier this year, Ps Reuben gave the illustration of Gideon. When the angel of the Lord appeared to him in Judges 6:11 and called him "valiant warrior", Gideon was far from it. In fact, he was threshing wheat in a winepress in the middle of the night so as not to be detected by the Midianites. Yet, because God had declared it, Gideon became one eventually as recorded in Judges 7.

This week and last, Ps Reuben gave another illustration -- that of David. When Samuel anointed him as king of Israel in 1 Sam 16, he was only a shepherd boy. He eventually became king in 2 Sam 2. In between that time, he was on the run from Saul and at one stage, even his own men turned against him as recorded in 1 Sam 30.

But the key verse in that chapter is verse 6

6 Moreover David was greatly distressed because the people spoke of stoning him, for all the people were embittered, each one because of his sons and his daughters but David strengthened himself in the LORD his God.

The verse starts off by saying that his men wanted to stone him, but ends by telling us that David strengthened himself in the Lord.

Ps Reuben suggested that David did so in 2 ways

(i) worshipping the Lord -- he turned his focus from himself and onto the Lord as recorded in Ps 52 and Ps 54

(ii) remembering what God had promised and declared to him.

Ps Reuben shared a verse from Eze 17:24b where God tells us "I am the LORD; I have spoken, and I will perform it." If His Word says it, He will surely cause it to come to pass. Another verse Isa 55:11 tells us that God's Word which goes forth from His mouth will not return to Him void (without producing any effect) but will accomplish what He pleases and purposes but will prosper in the thing which He sent it.

Yes, dear brothers and sisters in the Lord. Whenever we face difficulties that seem to prevent us from reaching our destiny as God's masterpieces, let us strengthen ourselves in the Lord the way David did by focusing on Jesus Christ and clinging fast to His promises which are yes and amen. Amen?

You can listen to Ps Reuben's sermons at the following links

Strengthening Yourself in the Lord (Part 1):
http://www.box.net/shared/669uhe6lz2

Strengthening Yourself in the Lord (Part 2):
http://www.box.net/shared/tylhsyf1qu

New and Improved

Saturday, 26th September 2009

A couple of months back, my daughter asked me when I was going to "upgrade" my handphone.

That is because I have been using the Samsung Omnia for more than a year already -- 14 months to be exact. My previous 2 phones had lasted me less than a year :-)

Dec 2006: Dopod 838 Pro (10 months)
Oct 2007: HTC TyTn II (9 months)
Jul 2008: Samsung Omnia (14 months)

In fact, I blogged about the TyTn II here

http://rootss.blogspot.com/2007/10/handy-tool.html

and the Omnia here

http://rootss.blogspot.com/2008/07/handier-tool.html

Well, Samsung has come up with a new-and improved-version of the Omnia, simply called Omnia II. And I went to the Starhub outlet near my office two days ago to get one for myself :-)

Unlike the previous version which had a proprietary-shaped headphone jack, this one has a standard 3.5mm one.

But the most distinguishing feature of the Omnia II is that it uses an advanced technology called AMOLED (active matrix organic light-emitting diode) as compared to TFT LCD (thin film transistor liquid crystal display) which is used in the Omnia I as well as in many other handphone and camera screens out there in the market. As a result, its display is much more vivid.

Watch the following YouTube video that compares the two display technologies:




It goes without saying that the Omnia II retains all the features of its predecessor -- 3.5G, WIFI, FM Radio, GPS and 5MP camera.

It has also incorporated Samsung's own touch-screen applications known as Samsung TouchWiz UI.

- The "Productivity" screen allows one to place his own frequently-used applications.

- The "Cube" screen contains a cube that can be rotated to access photos, music, videos, contacts, games and online applications.

Since it operates on Windows Mobile version 6.1 (upgradable to version 6.5), it can run Windows Mobile-based applications such as Pocket e-Sword and TCPMP.

On the right is a screenshot of Pocket e-Sword displaying my favourite verse and of TCPMP playing a video of Ps Prince's "Being Unshakeable In Times of Shaking".

Thank you Lord for this new-and-improved mobile wonder!

Word of God vs God of the Word

Friday, 25th September 2009

In my last blog entry, I spoke about an article that appeared in last Saturday's Straits Times. Well, there was an article that appeared on the front page of Saturday's Straits Times about a Singapore-born porn actress that was murdered by her boyfriend.

What caught my eye about that article was the following paragraph:

The San Gabriel Valley Tribune reported that Randone, 45, holds a 'bachelor's degree from Moody Bible Institute in Chicago and a master's of divinity degree from Southwestern Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas, according to a brief 1996 biography on the Baylor University Website'.

The murderer was theologicially-trained and was even a preacher at some stage of his life. He was exposed to the teachings of the Bible and could probably even quote chunks of the Scriptures. But one wonders whether he had a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and was aware of what Christ's finished work had accomplished for him.

In other words, he knew the Word of God, but he did not seem to know the God of the Word.

Contrast this to Ps Joseph Prince who does not have any sort formal theological training. Yet, because he knows the God of the Word and never fails to unveil Jesus in his sermons, God has used him to transform thousands of people in Singapore and millions of others around the world.

It is no wonder therefore that the apostle Paul counted as rubbish all the head knowledge and titles that he had accumulated before his Damascus road encounter.

How about you? Do you know the God of the Word? Do you know that Jesus is now our High Priest? Do you know that as He is, so are we in this world? Do you know that His work is a finished and complete one? If not, then go to Suntec City and listen to the grace-based sermons there. Or click on the following link to listen to Ps Reuben Ng :-)

http://www.box.net/shared/uzrv6pnyo8

Act of God?

Monday, 21st September 2009

There was an article that appeared in Saturday's Straits Times about a study mama who is seeking compensation from St Andrew's Cathedral. She was walking past the church and unfortunately, protruding branches from a tree (which was within the church compound) fell on her, causing her to be paralysed from the chest down.

But what caught my eye about the article was the following paragraph:
But when she tried to get compensation from the Anglican cathedral, it initially said no. It claimed the mishap was an act of God, and beyond its control. It also blamed the landscape contractor for failing to do a proper job.

For the world to attribute such mishaps to God, I suppose it is understandable.

But the sad fact of the matter is that there are fellow believers in the Body of Christ who are unable to distinguish the acts of God from the acts of the devil!

For example, I have heard of well-meaning Christians saying that God gives His children sicknesses to keep them humble and so as to draw close to Him. That being the case, maybe we should be praying for them to receive some terminal illness so that they can be super-close to God.

Ludicrous isn't it?

Yesterday, I was at the youth service in my church and Ps Reuben re-emphasised the "tripod foundation" that Christians should hold fast to whenever they read the Bible or go through life, and they are:
(1) God is good (Ps 119:68)
(2) His deeds are good and perfect (Js 1:17)
(3) God is love (1 Jn 4:8,16)

Will a God who is good, who is love and whose deeds are good and perfect, cause those branches to fall on that lady? Certainly not!!!

Jesus said in Jn 10:10 that it is the devil who kills, steal and destroys but He comes to give us life in abundance. The tree falling on that lady was an act of the devil. The twin towers collapsing was the act of the devil. SARS and H1N1 were acts of the devil.

Let us not wrongly attribute to God what are the evil works of the devil. Amen?

Not A Crumb Is Wasted

Sunday, 20th September 2009

Last week, my wife and I were in our own home church because Ps Reuben was preaching at the main service.

My church is currently doing a series on discipleship based on the book of Mark, and Ps Reuben preached on the passage of Mk 7:24-30 about the Syrophoenician woman who asked Jesus to heal her demon-possessed daughter.

When I first came across this passage as a youth, I was slightly puzzled by what I read because Jesus seemed to be insulting that woman by referring to her as a dog. But I did not dare to voice my objections for fear of offending God Himself and being struck by lightning for such blasphemous thoughts :-)

It was only recently that I realised that Jesus actually used the diminutive term "kynarion" κυνάριον (G2952) which means "little puppies". By doing so, He was allowing that woman a way to receive His grace and provision in advance of time!

Another progressive revelation to me was that Jesus travelled all the way to Tyre (which was Gentile territory) just so that He could set up a divine appointment with that woman! Just like how He crossed the lake with His disciples as recorded in Mark 5 for the sole purpose of healing that Gerasene demoniac. That is the extent and measure of the love of our God for us!

Ps Reuben entitled his sermon "Not A Crumb Is Wasted", hence the title of today's post. You can listen to it at the folllowing link:

http://www.box.net/shared/9sszops8bl

Searching For Grace

Saturday, 19th September 2009

Back in June 2008, I tried my hand at cartooning and came up with a strip called Umbrella. It depicts a well-meaning pastor trying to shield his congregation from grace teachings, which he considers to be heretic. He wants to prevent sin from entering the camp, but due to his veiled and law-based mind, actually ends up disqualifying his flock from receiving God's blessings instead.

Well, thanks to fellow grace embracer Peter Sze, I have been made aware of a cartoonist by the name of Mick Mooney who maintains a site called Searching For Grace (hence the title of today's blog entry).

In his cartoon series, Mick follows the adventures of John who comes from a law-based church of about 200 members. He is searching for grace but Moses, his pastor, is more interested in church growth success.

(I wonder if the names chosen by him are deliberate because John comes from the word Johan, which means grace in Hebrew, while Moses represents the Old Covenant).

My personal favourites are the ones entitled Spiritual Authority and and Church Orientation because they remind me of the previous youth pastor of my church :-)

Oh by the way, you can be a Searching For Grace fan on Facebook, and Mick is my 555th Facebook friend.

Why Do People Break the Very Law They Preach So Strongly About?

Sunday, 13th September 2009

Over the past 2 days, I have been blogging about the fact that it was Paul, the apostle appointed by the resurrected Christ, who on numerous occasions in his epistles, tells us that the Law has been superseded by Grace.

Some preachers get very uncomfortable when they read passages such as Rom 7 and Gal 4. You mean to say the Ten Commandments, the very bedrock of what defines God's standards, no longer apply to Christians? I remember feeling extremely disturbed when I first heard sermons like that myself. Being a Christian since I was 12, these types of messages went against the very foundation of my faith and truth be told, I was shaken.

It is probably because of this that many theologians rationalised by subdividing the Law into 3 parts:
(i) Moral -- represented by the Ten Commandments
(ii) Civil -- conduct and behaviour towards others
(iii) Ceremonial -- the washing of utensils etc.

They argue that Jesus, via His establishing the New Covenant, has done away with the ceremonial laws. Through the courts, the civil laws are replaced. But the moral law remains.

But therein lies a problem.

Firstly, God did not subdivide His laws; man did. James says in Js 2:10 that anyone who broke any part of them was guilty of breaking them all. This is because the Old Covenant was meant to be one composite whole, one package deal.

Secondly, let's study the following passage:

Romans 7
An Illustration From Marriage
1Do you not know, brothers—for I am speaking to men who know the law—that the law has authority over a man only as long as he lives?
2For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage.
3So then, if she marries another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress, even though she marries another man.
4So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God. 5For when we were controlled by the sinful nature,[a] the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death.
6But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.


Here, Paul uses the illustration from marriage to tell us that we, now being married to Jesus, so to speak, should not have anymore dealings with our previous spouse, the law.

Those same theologians would argue that the law in this passage refers to the civil and ceremonial law, and not the moral law. But let's read on...

7What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "Do not covet."
8But sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in me every kind of covetous desire. For apart from law, sin is dead.
9Once I was alive apart from law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died.
10I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death.

Maybe the Holy Spirit could foresee that the church down through the ages would attempt to make such a distinction between moral, civil and ceremonial. So Paul gave an example about what he meant by "the law" by making reference to one of the Ten Commandments -- "Thou shall not covet!"

Paul also mentions in 2 Cor 3:7 about "the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones”. Those of us who are familiar with the Bible will know that only the Ten Commandments were written and engraved on stone tablets. The civil and ceremonial laws were dictated to Moses. Hence, those who preach strongly on the Ten Commandments do not realise that they are ministers of death, killing you softly with those words :-)

Thirdly, how many of us Christians observe the Sabbath today, by not working between 6pm on Friday and 6pm on Saturday? Some have argued that it is a ceremonial law, but hey, it was one of the Ten Commandments. If God had meant for His laws to be subdivided into moral, civil and ceremonial, should He not have placed the Sabbath elsewhere? Unless, it was because He knew that there would come a time when man would arbitrarily subdivide them for Him that He deliberately placed this commandment amongst the other Nine?

Paul says in 1 Cor 15:56 that the strength of sin is the law, so the irony is that the more we try to keep them, the more we end up breaking them! In Rom 7, he wrote that he sincerely did not want to covet, but he ended up coveting!

Is it therefore not surprising that Rev Peter Koh committed intellectual theft when he plaigiarised that antinomian article, or when we read of that church elder who was supposed to rehabilitate prostitutes but ended up sleeping with them instead.

Dear friends, via the blood of Christ, God has put an end to the Old Covenant and superseded it with the New Covenant. Jesus even made that clear in one of His parables where He said that new wine should not be placed in old wineskins. Now His laws are written on our hearts. It is via His grace that we can live the victorious and abundant Christian life, and not via trying to keep the Ten Commandments. Amen?

Balancing Grace Actually Hinders Grace

Saturday, 12th September 2009

Thank you for all your prayers! We had a wonderful discussion during our cell meeting last night. Many fellow cell members were surprised to find those passages are actually in the scriptures!

May they be like the Bereans who went back to examine the scriptures further to see what was shared is indeed so. The seeds of the grace message have already been sown, so please continue to pray that there will be a bountiful harvest of radical grace transformation in my church. Amen?

This morning, I felt led by the Spirit to send the senior pastor of my church the following email, and included an article from Johnny Tatum (thanks Angie for the link) for his reading pleasure:


Dear Rev Koh

Greetings in the Name of the Lord!

I was not in church last week, but I heard from a fellow member that you had said we should balance law and grace.

With all due respect, we cannot do that because mixing grace with anything else actually hinders grace.

I know you mean well, but you need to be careful what you tell the congregation.

Would you tell married members to have balance in that it is okay to still continue to have romantic dealings with an ex-boyfriend or ex-girlfriend (see Rom 7)

Would you tell them Abraham should have been balanced, and not have cruelly banished Hagar and Ishmael from his home? After all, Ishmael was also his flesh and blood. (see Gal 4)

Would you tell them that to have a balance, it is okay to be lukewarm? (see Rev 3)

If not, then you should not tell them to balance law and grace!

Will continue to keep you in prayer that Jesus will show you that grace is but the only way.

In closing, please allow me to share the following article with you:


http://radicalgrace.com/grace4.htm

RADICAL GRACE
By Johnny Tatum

The purpose of this review of the Radical Grace Bible Study Series is to see why we do not balance grace with obedience and discipline, and to see how it is that grace produces a life that is free from the slavery to sin.

GRACE #4: BALANCING GRACE HINDERS GRACE

In this Radical Grace series, we are emphasizing grace and we are affirming that, for the believer, it is not biblical to balance grace with anything.

There are many Christians who believe that grace is good and who, unfortunately, also say that we must balance grace with something. And what they mean by balance is that we weaken (soften) the concept of grace by adding our obedience plus God’s discipline to balance GRACE.

Actually, there is a biblical concept of balance; however, it is not the case that we have one extreme over here, another extreme over there, and then we look for some middle ground and call that balance. In the Bible, balance is holding both extremes simultaneously.

As we have been seeing in this series, the Bible emphasizes grace — in the New Testament, the word grace is used 128 times. In fact, there is just one word that occurs more often—the word love. Interestingly enough, there is a very reasonable connection between the two words grace and love, because it was the Father’s love that caused Him to offer us His grace. Furthermore, Paul begins and closes each of his epistles with a reference to grace.

The main reason we emphasize grace is that through the New Testament, we find many wonderful spiritual qualities that are supposed to be part of the Christian life; and as we look at them, we see that all of them are produced [only] by grace.

Let us begin by reviewing the highlights of our study Grace #3: Ten Attributes That Are Produced Only By Grace. In our lives, Grace:

- Produces comfort and hope.
- Stimulates spiritual gifts.
- Produces spiritual fruit.
- Produces good works.
- Produces signs and wonders.
- Produces actual holiness.
- Produces labor for Messiah.
- Produces strength.
- Produces growth.
- [and the important one—] Releases us from the slavery to sin.

So you see, we emphasize grace, not to make light of sin, but because, in our lives, we want comfort and hope–spiritual fruit–good works–signs and wonders–actual holiness–labor for Messiah–strength–and growth produced, spiritual gifts stimulated, and to be released from the slavery to sin. It is amazing that all of these attributes come through grace!

However, it is not just the case that if we have grace we will have good works–comfort and hope–spiritual gifts–spiritual fruit–growth, etc. It is more than that. It is the case that there is no alternate way to receive these wonderful attributes; it is not as if grace is one way to get those aspects—it is the only way. But again, we have to say more than that. Not only is grace the only way to have these things in our lives, but also, if we try to add something to grace, then the process of producing this spiritual fruit is hindered. In fact, you can add so many things to grace that Paul says you can nullify grace working:

I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Messiah died needlessly. (Galatians 2:20)

Again, let us clarify what grace is not: Grace is not God overlooking sin and Grace is not God saying that sin is okay. If someone emphasizes that concept of grace, then he is wrong. And, as we saw in our Grace #3 study, if we have the wrong idea of the grace that saved us, then we will have the wrong idea of the grace that operates in our lives (sustains us).

When we were saved, it was not that God said Your sin is okay. God’s grace was not His accepting sin; He cannot do that. God’s grace that saved us was His taking our sin, putting it in the flesh of Messiah Jesus, and allowing Him to be crucified. So, when Jesus died, what died with Him? Our sin. That means legally, judicially, if God were to look at the body of sin we had committed, He would see that it had been killed. And that is what grace is: Grace was God judicially, legally, killing off our sin.

Now, the grace that sustains us is not God saying Since you are now a believer, your sin is okay. The grace that sustains us is very similar to what God did when He saved us. The grace that sustains us is grace killing off sin in our actual lives.

One way to look at it is this:

- Saving Grace was getting our sin off the books, and
- Sustaining Grace is getting sin out of our lives.

At the Cross the power of sin was broken, and grace working in our lives is a gradual, consistent process of the power of sin being broken in our actual lives.

A review of the three points in this study is as follows:

First: Each of these 10 attributes (comfort and hope, spiritual gifts, spiritual fruits, good works, signs and wonders, actual holiness, labor for Messiah, strength, growth, release from the slavery of sin) comes through grace.

Second: These attributes come only through grace, meaning there is not an alternate path to getting those things.

Third: If we attempt to add anything to grace, we are hindering the grace process; in fact, Paul says that we can nullify it.

Do you see why we do not try to balance grace with something? We do not want to hinder that process of having holiness in our lives, and if we add something to grace, that is exactly what we will do.

ADDRESSING CRITICISMS

People have said that we should add—mix in—the concept of obedience into grace. The reason we do not add anything to grace is that if we do, we are going to subtract from it. And, why do we not want to subtract from grace? Because we want spiritual fruit in our lives, and if we subtract from grace, it will not happen.

Another thing we are told is that when we emphasize grace [as we do], we are making light of sin. Actually, those who stress obedience are making light of sin. What is making light of sin? Saying that sin can be harnessed by discipline, that sin can be kept under control by doing our very best to obey. That is saying that sin is not that big a problem and that sin can be harnessed by partial obedience. That is where they do not tell the rest of the story; they do not go on to say that the obedience, which they emphasize, is something that we cannot do.

What is the best anyone can do trying his hardest to obey? Would you say it would be partial obedience? How about very partial? How about very superficial?

In light our own efforts toward obedience, let us consider the Ten Commandments (see Exodus 20), as follows:

- You Shall Not Murder – Is it possible for a human being to go his whole life and not commit an external act of murder? Yes, I would say most can and do. However, is it possible for someone to go his whole life and not hate anybody?

- You Shall Not Commit Adultery – Is it possible for someone to go his whole life and not commit adultery? Of course it is. But is it possible for anyone to go his whole life and never have lust in his heart?

- You Shall Not Steal – This is a tough one. Can someone go his whole life and never steal anything? Possibly. [I do not know about this one, but I do know that—]

- You Shall Not Covet – It is not possible for someone to go his whole life and never covet anything.

As you can see, the very best we can possibly do through self-effort is to obey partially, superficially.

So stressing grace is not making light of sin. We are saying that sin is such a monster—it is so horrible—that we do not have the resources to conquer it. We want it out of our lives because we know sin can be devastating and sin has consequences; however, we also see, from the Bible, that the only way to get sin out of our lives is by resting in grace. So obedience comes through grace—not vice versa—and that is why we do not soften grace by adding something to it as a balance.

SOFTENING GRACE

We have been looking at grace in its two aspects, as follows:

1. Grace as the freedom from punishment for sins, and
2. Grace as the freedom from the power of sin.

We have to look at grace in those two aspects, or we will not understand grace. However, God really does not see grace as two aspects; He looks at grace as just one power, and this one power gives us freedom from punishment and freedom from the power of sin.

So God sees grace as one power accomplishing two things, which means that if we soften one aspect, we will weaken the other aspect. That is what worries me.

The first aspect of grace is we are totally forgiven; we are not going to be punished for our sins ever. So if a believer says If I sin, God will punish me, he does not understand grace at all.

The second aspect of grace is that grace releases us from the power of sin, which does not mean that we are going to stop sinning. We are going to be sinners as long as we live, but what we can have is a situation where we are not slaves to sin. So, if a believer says Since I am under grace, I can do whatever I want, I am going to go sin it up, and there will be no consequences, he does not understand grace at all either.

If we soften the first aspect of grace, which is forgiveness, the fact that we will never be punished for our sins, we are going to weaken the second aspect, which is grace freeing us from the power of sin. But that is precisely the mistake we make. We want to soften that first part. And I do not know why we are always so anxious to do it, but we all are. Whenever someone says God is not going to punish me ever for my sins. I am totally forgiven. The sin I am going to commit tomorrow was pre-forgiven, the inevitable yeah buts begin, those dreaded monsters, the yeah buts. Do you know what those deadly monsters are?

What We Call Balance, God Calls Mixture

Friday, 11th September 2009

Last week, Ps Reuben was not preaching so my wife and I went to NewCre.

Back in my own home church, a ROOTSS subscriber informed me that Rev Peter Koh mentioned during his sermon that there should be a balance between law and grace. I would have agreed with his position even as recent as 5 years ago. But I now realise that what we call balance, God calls mixture.

That would actually be putting it very mildly. There are stronger words used to describe this.

In Romans 7, Paul describes such a mixture as spiritual adultery.

In Galatians 4, Paul quotes from Genesis where Sarah told Abraham to "cast out the bondwoman and her son".

In Revelations 3, Jesus considers such a condition as lukewarmness and He would vomit such out.

Anyway, it is my turn to lead the Word at my cell meeting tonight, and I asked my cell leader permission to change the discussion questions. I then sent out the following email:

Dear brothers and sisters in Christ

I understand that Rev Peter Koh mentioned during his sermon that we should find a balance between His law and His grace.

This is a topic that is very close to my heart, so if you folks do not mind, please allow us to discuss the following questions instead:

1. Can we balance law and grace?
2. The Law is good, but is it good for man?
3. Did God mean for the Law to be one composite whole, or can we divide it into moral, civil and ceremonial components?

I have included below relevant passages in scripture to facilitate this very interesting discussion.


Question 1: Can We “Balance” Law & Grace?

Consider the following 3 passages:

Romans 7
An Illustration From Marriage
1Do you not know, brothers—for I am speaking to men who know the law—that the law has authority over a man only as long as he lives?

2For example, by law a married woman is bound to her husband as long as he is alive, but if her husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage.
3So then, if she marries another man while her husband is still alive, she is called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is released from that law and is not an adulteress, even though she marries another man.
4So, my brothers, you also died to the law through the body of Christ, that you might belong to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit to God. 5For when we were controlled by the sinful nature,[a] the sinful passions aroused by the law were at work in our bodies, so that we bore fruit for death.

6But now, by dying to what once bound us, we have been released from the law so that we serve in the new way of the Spirit, and not in the old way of the written code.

Galatians 4
Hagar and Sarah
21Tell me, you who want to be under the law, are you not aware of what the law says?

22For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and the other by the free woman.
23His son by the slave woman was born in the ordinary way; but his son by the free woman was born as the result of a promise.
24These things may be taken figuratively, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children who are to be slaves: This is Hagar.

25Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children.
26But the Jerusalem that is above is free, and she is our mother.
27For it is written:
"Be glad, O barren woman,
who bears no children;
break forth and cry aloud,
you who have no labor pains;
because more are the children of the desolate woman
than of her who has a husband."[b]
28Now you, brothers, like Isaac, are children of promise.

29At that time the son born in the ordinary way persecuted the son born by the power of the Spirit. It is the same now.
30But what does the Scripture say? "Get rid of the slave woman and her son, for the slave woman's son will never share in the inheritance with the free woman's son."[c]
31Therefore, brothers, we are not children of the slave woman, but of the free woman.

Revelations 3
To the Church in Laodicea
14"To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:
These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God's creation.

15I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other!
16So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.

Question 2: The Law is good, but is it good for man?

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil was part of the vegetation that God created on the 3rd day and He saw that it was good, viz

Genesis 1
11 Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds." And it was so.

12 The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
13 And there was evening, and there was morning—the third day.

But was this tree good…….. for man?

Genesis 2
16 And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."

By the same token, God’s laws are good and perfect.

Psalm 19
7 The law of the LORD is perfect,
reviving the soul.
The statutes of the LORD are trustworthy,
making wise the simple.


But are they good…… for man?

Romans 7
Struggling With Sin
7What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "Do not covet."[b]

8But sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in me every kind of covetous desire. For apart from law, sin is dead.
9Once I was alive apart from law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died.
10I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death.

Paul also calls it “the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones” (2 Cor 3:7)
and also says that “the strength of sin is the law” (1 Cor 15:56)

Question 3: Did God mean for the Law to be one composite whole, or can we divide it into moral, civil and ceremonial components?

10For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it. (Js 2:10)

7For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another (Heb 8:7)
13By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear. (Heb 8:13)


Will let you know how our discussion went. Meanwhile, do keep my cell in prayer :-)

The Biggest Loser

Sunday, 6th September 2009

It's the 4th week in a row for us to attend NewCre because Ps Reuben has not been preaching.

The worship was led by Darlene Zschech and Hillsong. Ps Lawrence said she's going to be a grandma in 3 months' time :-)

Then Ps Joshua took the pulpit. My wife and I had listened to one of his midweek sermons on Healing and Financial Breakthroughs, during which he mentioned that one day he would share about how he had lost weight supernaturally -- without the need for exercising and dieting.

So it was really God's provision that he spoke about this this very day! I used to be 50kg in my teens and had a 26" waist. But since then, I have let loose and am now 76kg with a 36" waist. At 1.7m, that puts my BMI at 26.3 which means I am overweight. I will need to lose at least 6 kilos in order to be in the normal range. Friends who have not seen me for some time will inevitably comment that I had put on weight, lots of it, in fact :-(

During the sermon, Ps Joshua sang a song that was made popular in the 1980s by a group called Bad English. It is a love song sung by a guy to his sweetheart, but Ps Joshua changed the word "baby" to "Jesus" and voila!




Here are the lyrics of the song (as modified):

Sometimes I wonder
How I'd ever make it through,
Through this world without having you
I just wouldn't have a clue

'Cause sometimes it seems
Like this world's closing in on me,
And there's no way of breaking free
And then I see you reach for me

Sometimes I wanna give up
I wanna give in,
I wanna quit the fight
And then I see you, Jesus
And everything's alright,
everything's alright

When I see you smile
I can face the world, oh oh,
you know I can do anything
When I see you smile
I see a ray of light, oh oh,
I see it shining right through the rain
When I see you smile
Oh yeah, Jesus when I see you smile at me

Jesus there's nothing in this world
that could ever do
What a touch of your hand can do
It's like nothing that I ever knew

And when the rain is falling
I don't feel it,
'cause you're here with me now
And one look at you Jesus
Is all I'll ever need,
you're all I'll ever need

Chorus

Sometimes I wanna give up
I wanna give in,
I wanna quit the fight
And then I see you Jesus
And everything's alright,
everything's alright

So right...


The sermon made a lot of sense -- it was a revelation! It is when we behold Jesus as smiling at us that we get transformed into that same image from glory to glory.

There is this reality TV show entitled "The Biggest Loser" where severely horizontally-challenged people go through a tough regime of exercise and diet to lose as much weight as possible. Well, I am hoping to be the biggest loser, so to speak, without the need for exercise or diet.

After the sermon, I went boldly into the throne of grace and asked Jesus to give me the right desires for food so that my weight will drop to a more respectable 70kg within the next three months and I look forward to testifying that He has made it come to pass. Stay tuned :-)

May those same friends comment instead that I have lost weight instead. Amen?

Manga Mutiny

Saturday, 5th September 2009

On two previous occasions, I have blogged on Manga Messiah and Manga Metamorphosis. Those books cover the Gospels and the Acts and Epistles respectively.

I was at the Rock Gifts & Bookstore a couple of weeks ago and noticed that a third book -- Manga Mutiny -- has just been released. This book covers the books of Genesis and Exodus.

There is a saying that a "picture speaks a thousand words".

This is so true of the following events that took place in history.

(1) Abraham taking Isaac (his son, his only son, the son that he loved), up onto the mountain to be sacrificed (Gen 22).
Notice Isaac's reaction when Abraham starts to tie him up

(2) Rebekah swooning and falling off her camel when she first saw how handsome Isaac was
And Rebekah lifted up her eyes, and when she saw Isaac, she lighted off the camel. (Gen 24:64 KJV)
--- yes, that is what happened! The original Hebrew for "lighted" is naphal נפל (H5307), which means to "fall".

(3) Jacob waking up and exclaiming in shock when he finds that it was Leah
Morning came: There was Leah in the marriage bed! (Gen 29:25 MSG)

(4) Benjamin being given five times as much
When portions were served to them from Joseph's table, Benjamin's portion was five times as much as anyone else's. So they feasted and drank freely with him. (Gen 43:34 NASB)

You can see such other pictures at the following link:

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=103005&id=751059341&l=c91b36e7ac

Highly-recommended reading, just like the 2 other comic books :-)

Highly Recommended

Friday, 4th September 2009

This entire week, one of the girls in my department (let's call her W), who usually wears contact lenses, has been wearing spectacles to work.

Out of curiosity, I asked her yesterday if anything was the matter and she answered me bashfully that she is going for a lasik operation next week. The surgery requires the eyes not to be in contact with anything the week before.

I found out via another department colleague (let's call her T) who went for the surgery in July 2008 that she is going to the very same eye clinic in Paragon! Turns out that it was on the recommendation of yet another department colleague (let's call her Y) who went for a similar procedure in April this year. Y had seen how successful T's operation has been and thus went to the same opthalmologist for the procedure herself. And now W is going because she sees how well T and Y are coping post-op. I will not be in the least bit surprised if more were to follow suit.

As I reflect upon this, I realise that the same principle applies to the good news of the grace message. I am like that proverbial beggar who has discovered gourmet food, and cannot help but tell his fellow beggars about it as well. Ever since embracing the gospel of grace in August 2005, my life has been transformed. I used to think that the Christian life was a series of ups and downs, successes and failures. But now I know that it is to be one success story after another.

God's desire is for us to prosper in all things, just as our soul prospers. And prosperity means having a blessed marriage, children doing well in school, a job that brings much joy and satisfaction, wonderful bosses and colleagues, days filled with divine appointments, and so on.

In Gen 33, Moses records the reunion of two brothers -- Jacob and Esau. In verse 9, we read Esau saying that he had "plenty" (H7227 רב rab). But Jacob replied in verse 11 that God had given him "everything" (H3605 כל kol). That is what will happen to us when we have a good opinion of God and believe that He is really that good.

And after we have tasted and seen that the Lord is good, let us be His witnesses to highly recommend Him to those whom He has placed in our oikos. Amen?
Powered By Blogger