Easily Offended Christians

Friday, 1st May 2009

The recent saga that is happening at AWARE has not put Christianity in a good light.

If one had asked me what my stand on this would have been as recent as 5 years ago, I would probably be applauding the new Exco for standing up for their fundamentalist beliefs. I am sure many of my fellow church members would also agree with the tough stance the new guard is taking.

Now having encountered and embraced the grace gospel, my response can be summed up by the following article that Rev Peter Youngren wrote as his message for Easter 2009.

If we are easily offended, we should take a step back to ask ourselves if we are behaving more like the Pharisees or more like Jesus.


Easily Offended Christians - Peter Youngren

There are a lot of offended Christians these days. Some of the things which seem to cause outrage and offense are; profanity on television, open display of homosexuality in movies and on television, humor that degrades Christian values. Well, that’s just for starters. When Christians express outrage, shock and offense, it is as if that expression in itself is a badge of spirituality. “Look at me; how shocked I am at the sin and worldliness around me. Shouldn’t you react in a similar way? Aren’t you equally shocked? Well, maybe your spiritual sensitivities aren’t as fine-tuned as mine”.

There is only one problem with all of this. Can you think of a single time in scripture when Jesus was offended by the sins of unbelievers? The only time you could find something akin to offense in Jesus was when he spoke forthrightly to the self-righteous, hypocritical religious leaders. In fact, Jesus forewarned us that if we are persecuted for our beliefs we should not be surprised or offended. “These things I have spoken to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world”, (John 16:33).

Here is the catch. If we are easily offended or shocked, we become either isolationists or attackers of the very society, which we are supposed to reach. Isolationists live in a cloistered environment with little or no influence on those on the outside. Attackers are resisted, much like we would react on a lovely summer night when hornets start buzzing around our picnic table. We find no example in scripture that Philip was offended at the witchcraft in Samaria. What about Paul’s reaction in godless, sinful, Corinth or idolatrous Athens? In neither instance do we find offense or rebuke of pagan behavior, but rather a focused pointing towards Jesus Christ as the only hope.

Everyone of the individuals who carry out what you and I may deem as offensive acts, are included in the reconciliation that Jesus provided by His death on the cross. Easter reminds us that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself. The message of the Cross is the only power able to transform human behavior. Let’s not be shocked by the world around us, but let’s look for opportunities to get to know people, to share their lives and to tell them what Jesus has done for us. Happy Easter!



Having said that, the Bible does define a family unit as that being established between a man and a woman, and we should not be taking liberties to re-define it. My own personal conviction is that Focus on the Family, which has been accused of being anti-gay, is actually pro-family as the Bible defines it. That is why I am a regular contributor to that organisation in monetary terms and even signed up as a volunteer for their recent Flag Day. From a Christian's point of view, I think their sexual-awareness program is more appropriate.

5 comments:

Gentle Lamb said...

Imagine NCC leadership being taken over because a loop hole in the constitution by members who attended NCC for less than 1 month.

Be offended yes, but do not sin. It does not give one the right to go in another person's house and
take over it and claim ownership because the back door is left opened.

Always err in the side of grace. Once you take the law into your own hands and take the sword out from the sheath, incredible damage will be done to the witness of Christ and innocent parties may have their ears cut off.

In His Grace

357 said...

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this subject.

On the other hand, as a parent with young children, I am definitely very concern about the kind of liberal sexual educational programs conducted by the previous AWARE team.

Gentle Lamb said...

An important lesson is not to tell lies especially in public to the press. The New Exco and their feminist mentor public statements on the sexuality program were not based on facts as the stance of AWARE as per their handbooks was neutral in view of MOE regulations.

Its important not to get emotional and start playing with facts because ultimately it talks about our faith, our Christian Faith. Always be mindful of love, grace, and mercy and be consistent in our biblical interpretation. Are we preaching our culture, tradition, or religion, or are we preaching Christ the risen Lord?

There is a lot of talk about E1, E2, and E3 evagelism - relating to different culture, religions and language group. But Jesus stayed within E1, to the same culture and language. He was showing us that the greatest barrier is not language or culture but different classes in society whom we despised and condemned as intrinsic sinners.

The Pharisees, the people of the Word and the Law, who should know the bible best, did not see this because they could not see the heart of God beyond their own perception of what religion should be. The heart of God is the heart of grace to extend beyond those we deemed acceptable to us for a variety of religious, social reasons.

Ed said...

A question though:

Is the new Ex-co taking over the leadership baton based on religious reasons or based on the mission of AWARE?

I have a simple stand; if we're the ones painting it a religious affair, that does not necessary mean they are taking it on as a religious stand. It's only what we think it is, but we do not necessary represent them. :)

And AWARE was never about religions to begin with.

Anonymous said...

While the new ex-co intention was good however, the method was wrong. And the press reports didn't help to balance the truth of the matter. So the outcome wasn't pleasant.